🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a happy Rasmus Højlund in a Napoli shirt. Now, place that with a dejected Benjamin Sesko in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he just missed a sitter. Do not worry locating an actual photo of that miss; background information is your adversary. Then, add statistics in a big, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Share it across all platforms.

Would you point out that Højlund's goal count includes scores in the premier European competition while Sesko isn't playing in continental tournaments? Of course not. Nor will you highlight that several of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that his national team is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and creates many more chances. If you run online for a major brand, pure interaction is what pays the bills, United are the biggest draw, and context is your sworn enemy.

So the cycle of online material turns. The next job is to sift through a 44-minute podcast featuring the legendary goalkeeper and find the part where he describes the signing of Sesko "strange". Just before, where Schmeichel prefaces his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, cut that. Nobody wants that. Just make sure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the title. People will be furious.

The Season of Potential and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has long been one of my preferred times to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, squads and strategies are still fresh, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the coming months are planting their flags. The transfer window is closed. Nobody is talking about the multiple trophies yet. Everyone are still in the game. Right now, all is possibility.

Yet, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has also been one of my most disliked times to read about football. For while nothing has yet been settled, something must always be getting settled. Jack Grealish is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league at this moment? We need an answer immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

In many ways, Benjamin Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this respect, a player caught between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The need to delay definitive judgment, to let technical development and strategic understanding to mature. And the demand to generate instant verdicts, a conveyor belt of opinions and memes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a square that can not truly be solved.

It is not my aim to offer a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's time at Manchester United so far. He has been in the lineup four times in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and taken a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? Nor do I propose to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts argue passionately on a podcast over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be a success this year (one pundit), or whether it is more like 12 or 13 (Wright).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I loved watching him at Leipzig: a big, fast racing car of a forward, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: given the freedom to rampage but also the leeway to fail. Partly this is why United feels like the cruellest place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are summarily issued in about the time it takes to watch a short advertisement, the club with the largest and most ruthless gap between the patience and space he needs, and the opportunity he is going to get.

We saw an example of this over the international break, when a viral chart handily stated that the player had been judged – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the recent market by a poll of 20 agents. Naturally, the press are not alone in such behavior. Team social media, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a suspiciously high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now basically aligned along the identical rules, an environment explicitly nosed towards provocation.

The Psychological Toll

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to us? Do we realize, on any level, what this infinite sluice of aggravation is doing to our minds? Separate from the essential weirdness of playing in the middle of it all, aware on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about players is now essentially material, commodity, public property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, in part this is because United are United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the cycle, a major institution that must always be generating the big feelings. However, partly this is a seasonal affliction, a swing of opinion most visibly and harshly glimpsed at this time of year, about a month after the window has closed. All summer long we have been coveting footballers, praising them, drooling over them. Now, only a handful of games later, a lot of those same players are now being dismissed as failures. Is it time to be concerned about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the point of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that Sesko faces Liverpool on the weekend: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at home in the league and yet in their own situation of feverish crisis, like filing a a report on someone who went to the shops 30 minutes ago. Too open. Their star past his prime. The striker waste of money. The coach bald.

Perhaps we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has started to replace football the actual game, to inflect the way we view it, an entire sport repivoted around talking points and reaction, an activity that happens in the background while we browse through our phones, unable to detach from the constant flow of opinions and more takes. It may be Sesko taking the hit at present. However, everyone is losing a part of the experience in this process.