🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.