🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor could be the perfect choice for a daring scary movie about Jesus Christ, though not for the reasons many fans could guess. In reality, the star does not even act as Jesus in the new film: his role is referred to simply as a craftsman. The actor is cast as the Joseph in this narrative, working to uphold his beliefs while The Boy (acted by the young actor), their adolescent adopted son, begins to display miraculous gifts. The explanation it's hard to picture a different major actor playing this part is that although his character is stricken with numerous trials, the actor appears almost emotionally confident that the dark, grim small film is worth his time.

Cage's Recent Projects

Cage has been allocating those years more selectively recently. He yet makes more movies than the majority of regular audiences may ever watch — for instance, are you aware that the man has filmed three different Westerns recently? — however he also adds prestige critically acclaimed roles like one recent hit, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film sounds like in that category, because it’s not strictly scary, likely to stir debate, and takes a campy-sounding concept in a earnest manner.

Movie's Premise and Execution

Unfortunately, writer-director Lotfy Nathan fails to repay the audience's focus. The film begins with a interestingly wandering setting, marketed as drawing from an unknown scripture concerning Christ’s childhood. The Carpenter, The Mother, and the boy move frequently, anxious of religious persecution or doubt regarding The Boy’s mysterious gifts. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter mournfully notes. That continues as dark forces attack the family at their new home, getting a jump-start on that well-known scriptural test for The Boy.

Sometimes, the film mirrors an demonic possession-type horror film, except that no one of the lead characters are explicitly taken over. Rather, they are more and more distant mutually, when these forces infect a resident female (the actress, named “The Stranger”) that the son forms a relationship with, and presents all troubling visions of a bleak destiny. Cage's role notably struggles with his place within the plot, occasionally berating the boy who mystifies him.

Discussion and Sensitivity

The subject matter is likely to court controversy, and the director handles it with much delicacy — excessive, maybe. The notion of a teenage boy facing his destined offering and tempted by unknown powers is truly frightening, but Nathan could be wary of appearing sensational and keen to indicate his goals, thus he frequently retreats into dimly foreboding visuals. Characters brood incessantly — FKA Twigs, who showed real promise in a recent film update, interestingly — cedes her acting to her religious attire, occasionally interrupted by a few gruesome scary visuals.

Cage's Performance and Film's Shortcomings

Meanwhile, the actor flirts with precisely the type of overacting that his ironic fans may desire. One scene (shown) in the trailer in which Cage erupts and yells “My belief is broken!” When this sort of florid outburst is included in your Jesus-themed horror movie, maybe a more openly absurd approach would make better use of the actor's readiness to exaggerate if needed. Rather, The Carpenter’s Son is closer to the weaker straight-to-DVD productions the actor filmed over the 2010s — not the cheesy thrillers instead the dramas and supernatural thrillers that typically appear interesting, and usually have a few choice Cage moments, but ultimately feel like, indeed, low-budget DTV material.

Honestly, some of those, while less ambitious, were easier to view overall. At this point I must break my personal rule, not spiritual but work-oriented: Years back, a beloved editor persuaded me to banish words like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. These words convey little but a personal and broadly stated restlessness, withdrawing from the job of clearly expressing the intellectual and emotional experience of seeing an individual production. It's hard to communicate tedium without appearing dull oneself. It’s no more expressive as terming a movie “interesting.” “Say more,” that is.

However, I admit, I felt uninterested for a large part of the film. On the positive side, it’s a churchy kind of stultification, not because this movie is moralizing, but since it takes a kind of obedient endurance to view it. Eventually soon after starting, the film settles into a cyclic tempo of ongoing suffering, and never really