🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly bore the pressure of her family reputation. As the offspring of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous English composers of the turn of the 20th century, her identity was cloaked in the lingering obscurity of history.

The First Recording

Earlier this year, I reflected on these legacies as I got ready to make the first-ever recording of the composer’s 1936 piano concerto. Featuring impassioned harmonies, soulful lyricism, and valiant rhythms, this piece will grant music lovers valuable perspective into how this artist – an artist in conflict born in 1903 – imagined her reality as a artist with mixed heritage.

Legacy and Reality

Yet about the past. It can take a while to acclimate, to see shapes as they really are, to distinguish truth from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to face Avril’s past for a while.

I earnestly desired the composer to be following in her father’s footsteps. In some ways, she was. The rustic British sounds of parental inspiration can be heard in numerous compositions, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to look at the headings of her family’s music to see how he identified as both a standard-bearer of British Romantic style as well as a voice of the Black diaspora.

At this point Samuel and Avril began to differ.

American society assessed the composer by the brilliance of his music rather than the his racial background.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the offspring of a Sierra Leonean father and a British mother – began embracing his background. When the poet of color this literary figure visited the UK in that era, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He adapted Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the subsequent year incorporated his poetry for a musical work, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral work that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an international hit, especially with the Black community who felt shared pride as American society judged Samuel by the brilliance of his art instead of the colour of his skin.

Principles and Actions

Success failed to diminish his activism. During that period, he was present at the pioneering African conference in England where he encountered the Black American thinker the renowned Du Bois and saw a variety of discussions, covering the mistreatment of African people in South Africa. He remained an advocate to his final days. He kept connections with pioneers of civil rights such as this intellectual and this leader, spoke publicly on racial equality, and even talked about matters of race with the US President on a trip to the presidential residence in that year. As for his music, the scholar reflected, “he established his reputation so notably as a composer that it will endure.” He died in that year, in his thirties. However, how would the composer have thought of his child’s choice to be in South Africa in the mid-20th century?

Conflict and Policy

“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to S African Bias,” declared a title in the Black American publication Jet magazine. The system “struck me as the right policy”, Avril told Jet. Upon further questioning, she backtracked: she didn’t agree with this policy “as a concept” and it “ought to be permitted to run its course, overseen by well-meaning residents of all races”. Had Avril been more attuned to her father’s politics, or from segregated America, she could have hesitated about the policy. Yet her life had sheltered her.

Background and Inexperience

“I hold a English document,” she said, “and the authorities never asked me about my ethnicity.” Thus, with her “fair” appearance (as described), she traveled within European circles, supported by their admiration for her deceased parent. She presented about her family’s work at the Cape Town university and directed the broadcasting ensemble in Johannesburg, including the heroic third movement of her concerto, subtitled: “Dedicated to my Father.” While a skilled pianist personally, she avoided playing as the lead performer in her work. On the contrary, she always led as the leader; and so the apartheid orchestra played under her baton.

Avril hoped, as she stated, she “could introduce a change”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. When government agents became aware of her Black ancestry, she could no longer stay the nation. Her British passport didn’t protect her, the UK representative recommended her departure or risk imprisonment. She came home, feeling great shame as the magnitude of her naivety dawned. “This experience was a painful one,” she expressed. Compounding her disgrace was the printing that year of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her unceremonious exit from South Africa.

A Familiar Story

As I sat with these memories, I felt a recurring theme. The narrative of being British until it’s revoked – one that calls to mind African-descended soldiers who served for the UK in the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. Along with the Windrush era,